Educational research tool. Not investment advice. You are responsible for your own trading decisions.

Verdix.
← All analysis

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)

Verdict history · JPM

Every call Verdix has made on JPM.

While a verdict holds, its return keeps accumulating from the day the call was made — it resets only when the verdict itself changes.

Click any date below to read that write-up

WaitBalanced· Aug 22, 2026

Last month's WAIT trigger was a pullback to $310–$345 or a weekly close above $367. Price has since dipped from $362.84 to $351.58, grazing the upper edge of that pullback zone but not reaching the $330–$337 cluster where five of six voices would actually deploy capital. With the trigger unfired and no new catalyst forcing a re-rating, the panel shifts from WAIT to BALANCED: existing positions can ride the earnings momentum, but the margin of safety still is not there for fresh money.

See methodology for how verdicts are produced. Full track record →

The panel’s split verdict on JPM — and where they disagree.

BalancedLOW confidence

The case for and against roughly balance — no clear edge at today's price.

NYSE · Financials · 2026-08-22 · analysis, not advice

Key levels and fundamentals figures are sourced from public market data and filings. All panel verdicts, archetype reasoning, and synthesis are AI-generated analysis.

Verdict

Balanced

LOW confidence

Why

All six voices on the panel agree JPMorgan is a superb franchise with strong earnings momentum, yet every one concludes the stock at $351.58 — just 4% from its all-time high and climbing on thinning volume — already prices in the good news. The debate is not about the business but about whether to pay a full price for a cyclical earnings stream. The panel shifts from WAIT to BALANCED, waiting either for a pullback into the $330s or a decisive breakout above $367 before committing fresh capital.

Level to watch

Key support 337.25

−4.1% from 351.58

Next catalyst

Trigger to confirm the breakout: A weekly close above $366.50 on expanding volume would signal institutional re-accumulation and force a re-rating toward the bull-case $400+ zone.

The panel's take

Verdict: BALANCED · Conviction: LOW · Last price: 351.58 · Changed from WAIT

Panel: 0 Bullish · 6 Neutral · 0 Bearish → BALANCED

What changed since 2026-08-15:

  • Price: 362.84 → 351.58 (-3.10%)
  • Panel: 0 of 6 → 0 of 6 now Bullish — composition also changed: added The Activist Catalyst; removed The Asymmetric Bargainer
  • Trigger: A pullback into $330–$337 (the weekly EMA20, 38.2% Fibonacci retracement, and the level where five of six voices said they would buy) would flip this to BUY. Alternatively, a weekly close above $367 on expanding volume confirms the breakout and forces a re-rating. On the downside, a weekly close below $332 (EMA20 at $331.96) breaks the near-term trend and would flip this to a SELL-thesis breakdown.
  • Verdict: WAIT → BALANCED

Last month's WAIT trigger was a pullback to $310–$345 or a weekly close above $367. Price has since dipped from $362.84 to $351.58, grazing the upper edge of that pullback zone but not reaching the $330–$337 cluster where five of six voices would actually deploy capital. With the trigger unfired and no new catalyst forcing a re-rating, the panel shifts from WAIT to BALANCED: existing positions can ride the earnings momentum, but the margin of safety still is not there for fresh money.

The panel is unanimous in neutrality: all six voices see a high-quality franchise with strong earnings momentum, but every one concludes the current price already reflects the good news. The prior WAIT trigger was a pullback to $310–$345 or a weekly close above $367 — price has since drifted down from $362.84 to $351.58, dipping into the upper edge of the pullback zone ($345) but not far enough or long enough to satisfy voices who wanted $330–$337 (the EMA20/Fibonacci cluster) for a genuine margin of safety. With the trigger not fired and no new catalyst to force a re-rating, the panel shifts from WAIT to BALANCED — those already in can stay, but no fresh capital should be deployed at this level.

Key levels

Key levels · JPM

USD · as of 2026-08-22
Analyst consensus 374.57 ▲
R1366.5
+4.2%
S1337.25
−4.1%
S2333.11
−5.3%
S3322.8
−8.2%
NOW
351.58

Analyst consensus target 374.57 USD · range 305–420

Key support & resistance and analyst consensus — educational analysis, not advice. These are not entry or exit prices. Trading involves risk of loss.

Key resistance is the 52-week and all-time high at $366.50 — price is climbing toward it on the thinnest volume band of the last two years ($344–$366.50, only 87M shares traded vs 1.74B in the $300–$322 accumulation zone), making a failed breakout the proximate risk. Key support is the $330–$337 cluster: the weekly EMA20 at $331.96, the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement at $337.25, and the 38.2% retracement at $333.11 — this is the zone where five of six voices said they would buy and where institutional buying last materialised in size. The analyst consensus target of $374.57 sits just above resistance, implying only mid-single-digit upside even if the breakout succeeds.

What legendary investors think

We ran JPMorgan Chase & Co. past a panel of 6 legendary investors' frameworks.

The panel · 6 investors

🟢
0
Bullish
⚫
6
Neutral
🔴
0
Bearish
The Moat CompounderValue/Quality/Moat⚫ NeutralMed

Signal: JPMorgan trades at 2.64x book value and just 4% below its all-time high of $366.50, with thin volume at these levels signaling that the current price already bakes in the record earnings and raised NII guidance that the market has been cheering. Conviction: Conviction remains low because bank earnings are inherently cyclical and rate-sensitive — a business I cannot value with the same certainty as a simpler franchise — so a pullback toward tangible book value is the only entry that would give me genuine comfort.

The GARP OperatorGrowth (GARP)⚫ NeutralMed

Signal: The PEG ratio sits at 1.72 on trailing earnings and the forward P/E of 14.52 nearly matches the historical average, which tells me the market has already priced in the 22.7% EPS growth, the record IB fees, and every one of the nine upward analyst revisions over the last 60 days. Conviction: I need the PEG below 1.0 to get excited about a cyclical, and at this level the story is too widely known — the only thing that moves conviction higher is a pullback that makes the numbers look ugly enough for nobody else to want it.

The Intrinsic-Value ModelerValuation/DCF⚫ NeutralMed

Signal: My two-stage total-payout model places fair value at approximately $355, barely 1% above the current price, because the terminal fade from elevated NII toward a normalized 45% operating margin eats up most of the near-term earnings momentum when discounted at a 10.7% cost of equity. Conviction: Conviction is pinned at neutral because the range of plausible outcomes is unusually wide — bear-case $280 to bull-case $430 — and without a catalyst to anchor which path we are on, the model alone cannot pick a side.

The Quality RationalistMental Models/Quality⚫ NeutralMed

Signal: The put/call ratio is a lopsided 0.55 and short interest sits at just 1.1%, which means the crowd is already overwhelmingly optimistic about JPM, and that is precisely the kind of setup where I get cautious rather than reaching for my wallet. Conviction: What keeps me neutral rather than outright negative is the genuine quality of the franchise — Dimon's track record and JPM's scale advantage are real — but without a 10-15% discount to shake out the complacent money, I have no edge.

The Forensic SkepticContrarian/Forensic⚫ NeutralLow

Signal: Monthly RSI reads 69.6 and the volume profile shows only 87 million shares traded in the $344–$366 zone versus 1.74 billion shares accumulated in the $300–$322 trough, indicating that price is climbing on light participation, not institutional conviction, the classic signature of a mature move running low on fuel. Conviction: A crowded trade with zero margin of safety — intrinsic value around $350 on my blended model — keeps me sidelined; conviction would only build on a pullback toward tangible book or on clear evidence of institutional re-accumulation above $366 on expanding volume.

The Activist CatalystActivist/Capital Allocation⚫ NeutralLow

Signal: Insider ownership clocks in at just 0.36%, and while Dimon's reputation as the best bank CEO alive is deserved, management is not eating their own cooking at a level that signals urgency about the stock being undervalued here. Conviction: Conviction is held back because a world-class business at a fair price is not our game — we need fear, uncertainty, and a 30-50% discount to intrinsic value, and JPM at $351.58 offers none of those.

Each view is one investing framework applied to the stock — a perspective, not advice, and identical for every reader. Signals are the panel's own scale, not a recommendation to act.

Where they agree — and where they clash

Common ground

  • All six voices agree JPMorgan is a high-quality franchise with a wide moat, exceptional management, and genuine earnings momentum — no one disputes the business.
  • All six conclude the stock is fairly priced to slightly rich at $351.58, with no meaningful margin of safety relative to any reasonable intrinsic-value framework.
  • Every archetype identifies thinning volume near the all-time high ($366.50) as a warning that institutional conviction is absent at current levels.
  • The panel is unanimous that a pullback into the $330–$337 zone (the weekly EMA20 and 38.2% Fibonacci retracement) would restore enough margin of safety to flip the call to bullish.

The real debate

  • The Intrinsic-Value Modeler sees a wide $280–$430 valuation range and wants a catalyst to anchor which path we are on, while The Forensic Skeptic sees the range itself as the warning — when the bull case requires sustained perfection, the downside asymmetry is what matters.
  • The Quality Rationalist focuses on sentiment extremes (ultra-low short interest, bullish options flow) as the primary reason to stay out, whereas The Activist Catalyst is more bothered by the 0.36% insider ownership — two different lenses on the same absence of a compelling entry signal.
  • The Moat Compounder and The GARP Operator both want a pullback, but for different reasons: the former needs a price close enough to tangible book to fit a circle-of-competence framework, while the latter needs the PEG to drop below 1.0 so the numbers themselves signal a cyclical trough.

The question it comes down to: Does the current price reflect the peak of a favorable cycle that will normalize, or is JPMorgan's franchise quality durable enough to grow earnings through the next rate-cutting cycle and justify buying even at a full valuation?

The bottom line

  • Trigger to confirm the breakout: A weekly close above $366.50 on expanding volume would signal institutional re-accumulation and force a re-rating toward the bull-case $400+ zone.
  • Pullback level that flips the call: A decline into $330–$337 — the weekly EMA20 and 38.2% Fibonacci retracement — restores the margin of safety that five of six voices require to turn bullish.
  • Trend-break to monitor: A weekly close below $331.96 (the EMA20) would fracture the near-term uptrend and shift the debate from timing to whether the earnings cycle has already turned.
  • Next catalyst: Q3 2026 earnings on October 13 will test the upward-revision streak: a ninth consecutive beat extends the runway, but a miss on NII or a jump in credit provisions would validate the panel's caution.

contact@verdixhq.com · Published 2026-08-22 · Prices as of 2026-08-22 · Time horizon: 3–12 months · No direct position held in JPM · JPM verdict history → · Methodology →

Verdix's panel is made up of AI archetypes that apply the well-documented, publicly known investment frameworks of famous investors. They are AI agents — not the investors themselves. Verdix is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by any real individual, and the archetypes do not represent any real person's actual views, holdings, or statements. Every verdict is AI-generated.

Verdix provides educational equity research and AI-generated multi-perspective analysis. Nothing here constitutes personalized investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Verdicts are uniform across all users and do not consider your individual financial situation, risk tolerance, or objectives. Trading and investing involve substantial risk of loss. Past performance does not predict future results. Consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Stay ahead of JPM's next verdict

The panel's view can flip on new earnings, a guidance cut, or a valuation shift. Get the update the moment it happens — not weeks later.

One email, only on a verdict change. Unsubscribe anytime.