Educational research tool. Not investment advice. You are responsible for your own trading decisions.

Verdix.
← All analysis

Oracle Corporation (ORCL)

Verdict history · ORCL

Every call Verdix has made on ORCL.

While a verdict holds, its return keeps accumulating from the day the call was made — it resets only when the verdict itself changes.

Click any date below to read that write-up

WaitSell· Aug 22, 2026

The prior WAIT verdict at $150.52 held because the panel saw a good business trapped in a bad chart but without enough technical damage to justify a SELL. Since then, the stock has slipped another 2.7% and, more importantly, The Moat Compounder was replaced by The Activist Catalyst, whose framework treats negative FCF and insider selling as categorical disqualifiers rather than negotiable risks. That shift, combined with the Forensic Skeptic and Intrinsic-Value Modeler now explicitly linking their bear cases to the same $23.7B cash burn, tipped the arithmetic from WAIT to SELL even though no single archetype changed its own signal.

See methodology for how verdicts are produced. Full track record →

The panel’s case against ORCL — and where they disagree.

SellLOW confidence

The case against outweighs the case for at today's price.

NYSE · Information Technology / Software & Cloud · 2026-08-22 · analysis, not advice

Key levels and fundamentals figures are sourced from public market data and filings. All panel verdicts, archetype reasoning, and synthesis are AI-generated analysis.

Verdict

Sell

LOW confidence

Why

Five archetypes weigh Oracle at $146.47 and none goes bullish. The business posts 25% net margins and 27% earnings growth, but $23.7B of negative free cash flow, a $68M insider sale by the Vice Chairman, and a weekly Stage 4 downtrend that has the monthly EMA50 at $139.90 as its last structural support produce a unanimous panel split: three Bears, two Neutrals, zero Bulls, and a low-conviction SELL verdict.

Level to watch

Key resistance 148.82

+1.6% from 146.47

Next catalyst

Line in the sand: A weekly close above the weekly EMA200 at $148.82 would break the immediate Stage 4 downtrend and force a re-evaluation of the bear case.

The panel's take

Verdict: SELL · Conviction: LOW · Last price: 146.47 · Changed from WAIT

Panel: 0 Bullish · 2 Neutral · 3 Bearish → SELL

What changed since 2026-08-15:

  • Price: 150.52 → 146.47 (-2.69%)
  • Panel: 0 of 5 → 0 of 5 now Bullish — composition also changed: added The Activist Catalyst; removed The Moat Compounder
  • Trigger: A weekly close above the weekly EMA200 ($148.82) and the weekly EMA20 ($157.44) would break the immediate Stage 4 downtrend — until then, every rally is a sale into resistance. A break below $139.90 (monthly EMA50) confirms full Stage 4 on the monthly timeframe and opens the path to $120–122.
  • Verdict: WAIT → SELL

The prior WAIT verdict at $150.52 held because the panel saw a good business trapped in a bad chart but without enough technical damage to justify a SELL. Since then, the stock has slipped another 2.7% and, more importantly, The Moat Compounder was replaced by The Activist Catalyst, whose framework treats negative FCF and insider selling as categorical disqualifiers rather than negotiable risks. That shift, combined with the Forensic Skeptic and Intrinsic-Value Modeler now explicitly linking their bear cases to the same $23.7B cash burn, tipped the arithmetic from WAIT to SELL even though no single archetype changed its own signal.

Three of five voices are Bearish; the two Neutrals both acknowledge the stock is a good business at an attractive valuation but refuse to commit until the technical picture improves — a PRICE/TIMING objection, not a defence of the business. With zero Bullish votes and the Bears outnumbering the rest 3–2, SELL is the arithmetic read of the panel. The As-of price of $146.47 sits below the weekly EMA200 ($148.82) and just above the critical monthly EMA50 ($139.90); that thin sliver is the only thing keeping a full Stage 4 collapse at bay, so the risk of a break toward $120 dominates the near-term calculus.

Key levels

Key levels · ORCL

USD · as of 2026-08-22
Analyst consensus 246.43 ▲
R3163.98
+12.0%
R2157.44
+7.5%
R1148.82
+1.6%
S1139.9
−4.5%
S2120.14
−18.0%
S3114.5
−21.8%
NOW
146.47

Analyst consensus target 246.43 USD · range 110–400

Key support & resistance and analyst consensus — educational analysis, not advice. These are not entry or exit prices. Trading involves risk of loss.

Key resistance clusters tightly overhead: the weekly EMA200 at $148.82 is the first gate on any bounce, followed by the weekly EMA20 at $157.44 and the cluster at $163.98–$173.49 where the monthly 78.6% and 61.8% Fibonacci retracements overlap with the monthly EMA20. On the downside, key support sits at the monthly EMA50 at $139.90 — the last line before an open-air drop to the $120.14 weekly volume POC (historical accumulation zone) and the weekly swing low at $114.50. The analyst consensus target of $246.43 implies 68% upside, but that target sits above the $191.38 monthly volume POC, which is now a historical resistance zone.

What legendary investors think

We ran Oracle Corporation past a panel of 5 legendary investors' frameworks.

The panel · 5 investors

🟢
0
Bullish
⚫
2
Neutral
🔴
3
Bearish
The Intrinsic-Value ModelerValuation/DCF🔴 BearishLow

Signal: Even with optimistic reinvestment-efficiency assumptions, a disciplined DCF anchored on capex that consumed $23.7B of cash in FY2026 prices ORCL at $118, 19% below the current quote. Conviction: Conviction is capped at 55% because the terminal value rests on a sales-to-capital ratio improving from 0.18 to 2.0, a jump that has no precedent inside this business and makes the bear case of $85 at least as credible as the base case.

The Asymmetric BargainerContrarian/Deep Value⚫ NeutralLow

Signal: The stock passes the simplicity and upside tests on 25% net margins and a 0.62 PEG ratio, but the Vice Chairman’s $68M insider sale at higher prices is the kind of signal that turns a potential mispricing into a watchlist-only name. Conviction: The Dhandho framework stalls because the downside is not clearly limited: a break of the $139.90 monthly EMA50 would open a path to $110–120, and the $167B debt stack means the floor is not asset-backed but sentiment-driven.

The GARP OperatorGrowth (GARP)⚫ NeutralMed

Signal: The PEG of 0.70 for a company growing earnings at 27% is the cheapest this operator has seen, but the weekly chart is in an entrenched Stage 4 downtrend with price beneath all three key moving averages and no oversold reading to suggest exhaustion. Conviction: Conviction stays on the sidelines because the market is ignoring 82% analyst buy ratings while the Vice Chairman liquidated his entire exercised position: price action and insider behavior are voting against the valuation, and until one of those two flips, the bargain is theoretical.

The Forensic SkepticContrarian/Forensic🔴 BearishMed

Signal: Tangible book value is negative because $62.3B of goodwill alone exceeds total equity, so there is no asset floor beneath the share price while free cash flow ran at negative $23.7B for the year. Conviction: Conviction is held back only by the absence of a breakdown below $139.90: the monthly EMA50 is the last technical support keeping a full Stage 4 collapse from becoming the base case, and a debt-rating downgrade would be the catalyst that confirms it.

The Activist CatalystActivist/Capital Allocation🔴 BearishLow

Signal: A business that burns $23.7B of free cash flow in a single year while its Vice Chairman sells $68M of stock into a 57% drawdown fails every test of a simple, predictable, cash-generative franchise this framework requires. Conviction: The 50% confidence reflects the fact that Ellison’s 40% insider ownership makes activism impossible and capex trajectory is the only variable that matters; without segment-level unit economics, the bear case is clear but the precise floor is not.

Each view is one investing framework applied to the stock — a perspective, not advice, and identical for every reader. Signals are the panel's own scale, not a recommendation to act.

Where they agree — and where they clash

Common ground

  • The business itself has real quality: 25% net margins, 33% operating margins, and a wide moat from database and ERP switching costs.
  • Negative free cash flow of $23.7B is the central problem, driven by $55.7B in annual capex that consumes all operating cash flow and then some.
  • The Vice Chairman’s $68M insider sale at $156–164 is a red flag every archetype treats as material.
  • The technical picture is unambiguously bearish: weekly Stage 4, price below all major moving averages, and the monthly EMA50 at $139.90 is the final structural support.
  • Analyst consensus (82% buy, median target $245) is disconnected from price action and cash-flow reality; every archetype either dismisses it or treats it as a contrarian warning.

The real debate

  • The Asymmetric Bargainer sees ORCL as a good business at a reasonable price with a borderline Dhandho pass and would deploy capital below $120, while The Intrinsic-Value Modeler calculates fair value at $118 base-case and sees no margin of safety even at current levels, making the two disagree on whether the stock ever becomes cheap enough to own rather than just cheaper than before.
  • The GARP Operator treats the 0.70 PEG as proof the stock is a bargain in isolation but refuses to act until technicals improve, whereas The Forensic Skeptic argues the PEG is a dangerous illusion because non-GAAP earnings exclude the capex burden that makes true economic earnings negative.
  • The Activist Catalyst frames the negative FCF and insider selling as structural disqualifiers that make valuation irrelevant, while The Asymmetric Bargainer frames them as uncertainty that creates the very mispricing a patient buyer can exploit once the technical trend reverses.

The question it comes down to: Does the capex cycle peak soon enough to turn free cash flow positive before the debt load and competitive pressure force a break below $139.90 — or is the current price already discounting a capex normalization that may never arrive?

The bottom line

  • Line in the sand: A weekly close above the weekly EMA200 at $148.82 would break the immediate Stage 4 downtrend and force a re-evaluation of the bear case.
  • Breakdown trigger: A close below the monthly EMA50 at $139.90 confirms full Stage 4 on the monthly timeframe and opens the path to $120–122.
  • Capex inflection to watch: The first quarter in which capex falls below 100% of operating cash flow would change the FCF narrative overnight; the September 2026 earnings print is the next opportunity for that signal.
  • Insider pivot: Insider buying by Ellison, Catz, or another senior executive would neutralize the Vice Chairman’s June sale — silence or further selling reinforces the bear case.

contact@verdixhq.com · Published 2026-08-22 · Prices as of 2026-08-22 · Time horizon: 3–12 months · No direct position held in ORCL · ORCL verdict history → · Methodology →

Verdix's panel is made up of AI archetypes that apply the well-documented, publicly known investment frameworks of famous investors. They are AI agents — not the investors themselves. Verdix is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by any real individual, and the archetypes do not represent any real person's actual views, holdings, or statements. Every verdict is AI-generated.

Verdix provides educational equity research and AI-generated multi-perspective analysis. Nothing here constitutes personalized investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Verdicts are uniform across all users and do not consider your individual financial situation, risk tolerance, or objectives. Trading and investing involve substantial risk of loss. Past performance does not predict future results. Consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Stay ahead of ORCL's next verdict

The panel's view can flip on new earnings, a guidance cut, or a valuation shift. Get the update the moment it happens — not weeks later.

One email, only on a verdict change. Unsubscribe anytime.